Are you chasing green scores in the Core Web Vitals? Is your Lighthouse score still far from 100? Here is the shortcut.
Page speed optimization sounds simple, but it is often an opaque labyrinth: countless recommendations, conflicting test results, and limited developer resources. We help you avoid getting lost and instead optimize exactly what truly delivers impact.
We ensure that slow load times become a thing of the past and that your website can realize its full conversion and revenue potential.
Page speed as a revenue lever: why load time is critical for your business
Fast websites perform better — measurably better. Even a few seconds can decide between a purchase and a bounce: a single additional second of load time can reduce conversion rates by up to 20%. This is clearly shown by a Google study: speed is not a nice-to-have, but a revenue driver. Users are impatient — and so is Google. Page speed and core web vitals are official ranking factors. That means slow pages are not only rated worse than competitors, they can also slow down Google’s crawling. If your pages take too long to load or consume unnecessary resources, Google may only crawl a fraction of them. At the same time, users abandon faster when searching, filtering, or loading product lists takes too long. Particularly critical: if the checkout process is not performant, many users simply abandon the purchase.
Page speed is not just a technical detail — it is critical to your revenue.
The most important metrics for measuring page speed
Metric
Explanation
Benchmark
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
Time until the server responds with the first byte, meaning the first time it “reacts” after a page is requested
≤ 0.3 seconds
Start Render
Time until the first visible content is rendered by the browser
≤ 1.5 seconds
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
Time until the largest visible element in the initial viewport is loaded (e.g., image or text block)
≤ 2.5 seconds
First Input Delay (FID)
Response time of the page to the first user interaction (deprecated core web vital)
≤ 100 milliseconds
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
Successor to FID: measures consistent response times during interactions
≤ 200 milliseconds
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
Measures visual “shifting” or “jumping” of elements while the page loads
≤ 0.1
Total Blocking Time (TBT)
Total time during which the page is blocked and cannot respond to user input
≤ 300 milliseconds
Note: These benchmark values serve as general guidance. They must always be evaluated in the context of your website.
A simple landing page with some text and images naturally achieves better scores — and with far less effort than a complex online store with dynamic filters or interactive elements that rely on JavaScript.
What does a Lighthouse score of 100 actually mean?
A score of 100 in Google Lighthouse indicates that, under the defined test conditions, your website achieves the highest possible rating in performance, SEO, accessibility, and best practices.
Important: these values are based on simulated measurements (“lab data”). Real user experiences may differ. A perfect score is a strong signal, but not a guarantee of an excellent user experience.
What is the difference between page speed and core web vitals?
While page speed primarily deals with the loading speed of a website, the core web vitals explicitly focus on the perceived user experience.
Improving load speed does not automatically lead to a better user experience — and vice versa. Core web vitals and page speed complement each other but measure different aspects. It is technically possible to optimize page speed without noticeably improving user experience.
The core web vitals — LCP (Largest Contentful Paint), INP (Interaction to Next Paint), and CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) — are much closer to real user perception and are difficult to “game.” However, you should not rely exclusively on these three metrics. Traditional load time indicators such as time to first byte (TTFB) or start render also provide important signals and influence the core web vitals themselves.
Google Search Signals für Page Experience (Quelle: developers.google.com)
Page Speed Audit — a comprehensive deep dive
Unlike a comprehensive technical SEO Audit, we focus here exclusively on all performance-related aspects of your website. Our page speed audit provides you with a solid analysis — a well-founded snapshot of the current state — from both the perspective of search engines and users. The assessment is based on a multi-stage process that combines technical depth with practical recommendations.
1
Tool-based analysis
We analyze your website using professional tools and identify weaknesses that negatively affect load times and user experience. In doing so, we capture both the core web vitals and other relevant performance metrics.
Manual expert review
Not everything can be captured automatically. That is why our experts also review your website manually — with a trained eye for the details within your technical architecture that make the difference. For example:
Use and optimization of media (e.g., image formats, sizes, compression, smart cropping)
Third-party scripts and integrations (e.g., tag manager, social media plugins, A/B testing tools)
2
3
Custom metrics and context analysis
Every website is unique. That is why, on request, we also provide custom load time measurements — either for predefined performance metrics or along particularly important user journeys, for example:
Loading behavior of complex filter functions or search results
Performance of the checkout process
Together with you, we define the relevant page types and test conditions before the audit starts — ensuring that the needs of your target audience and business goals are directly reflected in the analysis.
Why should different templates be tested?
Websites often consist of different templates (e.g., for landing pages, product pages, or blog posts). These can vary significantly in terms of the type and amount of content (text, images, interactive elements, JavaScript, etc.). Only by testing different page types can all relevant optimization opportunities be reliably identified.
Why should measurements be taken under different conditions?
Page load speed depends on many factors, including the user’s internet connection and the device types used. To get a realistic picture of actual load times, different conditions must be taken into account:
Mobile vs. desktop: Mobile users often have poorer network connections than desktop users, which affects load times. Performance should therefore also be tested on smartphones and tablets.
Different browsers: Different browsers (Chrome, Safari, Firefox) render pages differently, which can affect load times. Testing across multiple browsers is necessary to ensure the best possible performance.
Geographic differences: Users in different regions often experience different load times, especially if your website is not delivered via a global CDN and page speed is influenced by the physical location of the server. Testing under different geographic conditions is therefore critical.
First-time vs. returning visitors: Load times for the first page view are often significantly longer when no or insufficient cache directives are set. Returning visitors benefit greatly from optimized caching. That is why “repeat view” performance should always be considered as well.
Slow websites are not just conversion killers. Especially when direct competitors are faster than your own site, poor performance also impacts organic rankings.
Matthias Hotz, SEO expert
Lab data vs. field data
When evaluating metrics, it is always important to consider the conditions under which they were measured.
LAB DATA
FIELD DATA
Lab data is collected in a controlled environment with predefined device and network specifications. When it comes to measuring page performance, lab data is useful for reproducing and fixing potential performance issues at will.
Field data reflects the browser experience of real users who have visited the website. It is influenced by the connection and device they used while browsing. Field data is also referred to as “real user monitoring” (RUM). Google collects so-called “CrUX data” (Chrome User Experience Report) via the Chrome browser for this purpose.
simulated, artificial data
real users
a single selected device (per test run)
multiple device types
one network connection (per test run)
multiple network connections
one predefined location (per test run)
multiple geo-locations
generated on demand in real time
historical data available (CrUX last 28 days)
on demand for a single URL (per test run)
aggregated for the entire domain (average) or per URL
For identifying issues that your real users are facing
For verifying issues and validating fixes during development
Do you need expert guidance for implementing the measures?
You have already identified the causes of your poor page speed scores, but do not know the most efficient way to move into execution? Are you missing clear prioritization of your to-dos?
In this case, we provide strategic sparring and expert mentoring. We help you tackle the right measures quickly and effectively. This includes, among other things:
Ticket prioritization: We show you how to identify the most important performance issues and work through them pragmatically in the right order.
Efficient communication with development teams: We help you formulate technical measures clearly and collaborate effectively with your developers so the relevance of the topics is properly conveyed.
Tailored optimization advice: From simple quick wins to more complex measures — we share proven tips that noticeably improve your website’s performance.
What we stand for. And what you can rely on.
High-End Expertise
Best-in-Class SEO & Coding Know-How
Hands-on Consulting
Pragmatic Solutions with a direct Impact
100% data-driven
Making Success comprehensibly measurable
Impact over Scale
Genuine Partnership - no scaling at all costs
This is what a project with ONE Beyond Search looks like
Fill out the contact form
Free initial consultation
Offer and project start
Project progress and reporting
A brief and concise description of your request will help us to process it quickly and efficiently. We will contact you within 48 hours to arrange an appointment for an initial consultation.
We get to know each other during the initial consultation. We clarify your current situation and the goals you want to achieve. We then agree on the appropriate service packages and framework conditions in order to create a tailor-made offer.
We begin our collaboration once the offer has been signed. To get started, we organize a kick-off meeting with all relevant stakeholders to clarify any open questions, refine objectives, and begin implementation immediately.
We will keep you regularly informed about progress, provide reports, and discuss the results. Regular feedback and review sessions are planned for ongoing projects in order to continuously improve our collaboration.
Get in touch!
We are happy to talk to you about your Page Speed needs - no strings attached. Or send us an email directly to: hello@onebeyondsearch.com
Vielen Dank.
Wir haben Ihre Anfrage erhalten und melden uns umgehend bei Ihnen.
Frequently asked questions
A green status for the core web vitals (LCP, FID, CLS) is a strong signal of a technically sound website and a good user experience. Google uses the core web vitals as a ranking factor — pages with better values can therefore be favored in rankings.
However, it is important to note that the core web vitals are only one part of the overall spectrum of ranking factors and signals. Even perfect scores do not guarantee top positions if other SEO areas are neglected. To compete at the top of Google, the entire package must be optimized — content, technology, structure, and more.
The duration depends on the complexity of your website and the issues identified. A basic page speed audit and the implementation of the most important optimizations can often be completed within a few days to two weeks. More complex sites may require more time and ongoing optimization.
Important: if page speed is not consistently integrated into the development process, good scores will not be sustained in the long run. New features, additional components, or A/B testing tools can quickly erode hard-earned improvements.
Partially. Smaller optimizations, such as reducing image sizes or enabling caching, can sometimes be done directly in the CMS settings. For deeper technical adjustments and sustainable improvements to load times and core web vitals, support from experienced developers is usually required.